Cosmos

September 2015

How should the cosmos be grasped, this enormity that includes the terrestrial universe and celestial objects? How should it be visualized? Held in the hand?

Depicting systems of relationships that organize a whole, cosmologies have for long been the preferred subjects of study in Anthropology. They are commonly found in the form of all-encompassing representations (such as a mandala or a globe), or else in the form of objects containing the cosmos (such as a cauldron). To use other terminologies, they can be defined as “cosmograms”, which deal with the cosmos as an independent and autonomous entity, or as “cosmic objects”, which contain the cosmos. Or, to formulate it differently again, these cosmologies reveal “panoptic” views which make it possible to “easily take it in at a glance”, or “oligoptic” views, offering partial, mobile, connected views of the totality that they seek to express. Anthropology and also the history of modern knowledge and the anthropology of science and technology, are also familiar with objects and systems that make it possible to hold the cosmos in the hand or to have it before the eyes, making it possible to contemplate it, to control it and to experiment with it. Nevertheless, what are the small-scale operators needed for such maneuvers?

In proposing to approach cosmologies in a different way from representations of the cosmos, the authors of this new issue of Gradhiva invite readers to follow the slow, patient, often laborious, sometimes confused, descriptions of the cosmos, exploring its ingredients or components, as well as their modes of linkage. How is the cosmos picked up – rather than captured? What are its identifiers? What is locally capable of serving as an indicator of changes that are beyond our control (such as atmospheric changes)?

Buy this issue online

Contents

Special issue: cosmos

Coordinated by Sophie and Christine Jungen Houdart

Studies and essays

Scientific column

Description